Paper: Accidents ashore: Occupational safety challenges on wharves in Newfoundland and Labrador

Author(s) and Affiliation(s):
Ben Jackson, SafetyNet Centre for Occupational Health and Safety Research
Barbara Neis, Dept. of Sociology and Senior Research Associate SafetyNet Centre for Occupational Health and Safety Research
Scott MacKinnon, Co-Director, SafetyNet Centre for Occupational Health and Safety Research
Download Presentation PDF:
Day/Time: Saturday at 14:00
Room: St. Patrick Room, 3rd Floor
Objectives:

To identify the safety issues associated with fishing and recreational wharves in rural Newfoundland. To identify the activities and groups associated with these wharves and their attendant risks. To identify the components that make up the regulatory framework for wharf safety and to examine how these regulatory elements interact in the field. To document some of the factors that contribute to the risk of accident and the prevention challenges specific to this context.

Methods:

Pilot, multi-methods study the design of which was worked out in collaboration with a steering committee of stakeholder groups. Methods included: a detailed and systematic review of the literature on wharf safety; semi-structured interviews in 18 communities with 41 local wharf users; key informant interviews with representatives of agencies concerned about and/or with a mandate to address wharf safety; a review of documents explaining governance rules and practices on wharves; a telephone survey with a random sample of harbour authority representatives and dockside monitors.

Results:

Safety on wharves is seriously under-researched globally. NL wharves and harbours are important industrial, recreational and semi-public spaces located primarily in rural and remote environments where access to OHS expertise and monitoring are very limited. They are associated with very diverse and often risky activities in high risk environments (proximity to water, limited space to operate, challenging weather conditions) and associated substantial risk of injury or death. Reported hazards and risk factors include: time pressure/rush periods of intensive activity; bad weather (wind, ice, snow); congestion; parked vehicles; debris on the wharf; and, public access. Slips/trips/falls and Struck by falling/flying object are prominent among injuries identified in interviews. Perceptions of risk appear to vary among user groups. Wharves are multi-employer worksites where the employer who creates the risk might be different from the employer who exposes his or her workers, and different again from the employer who controls the worksite at any one point in time. It is not always clear what employer is responsible for addressing specific safety issues in this shared work environment. More generally, jurisdictional responsibility for ensuring and promoting safety on wharves is complex, ambiguous and evolving. Lack of clarity at all levels regarding safety responsibility may have contributed to the invisibility of risk on wharves and to prevention challenges over past decades.

Conclusions:

The use of wharves as a worksite by multiple and diverse groups of workers associated with multiple employers, combined with the high risk environments and activities associated with wharves, extremely limited local OHS expertise and jurisdictional ambiguities appear to have contributed to the lack of research on safety on wharves in NL and elsewhere, to the invisibility of substantial risk in official statistics, and to major prevention challenges for these critical worksites.